-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: avoid colloquialism #12417
doc: avoid colloquialism #12417
Conversation
COLLABORATOR_GUIDE.md
Outdated
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ Additionally: | |||
|
|||
### Technical HOWTO | |||
|
|||
_Optional:_ ensure that you are not in a borked `am`/`rebase` state | |||
Optional: Clear any `am`/`rebase` that is already underway. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This isn't really optional
, it's necessary if you are in an am
or rebase
state. People who are less familiar with Git aren't going to know whether or not they need to do it.
Maybe say something like:
If
git status
showsRebase in progress
orYou are in the middle of an am session.
, then you need to cancel therebase
oram
with:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed the optional
label.
@gibfahn LGTY now?
I'm +0. Googled Also, agree with @gibfahn regarding the optional part. |
I'm But I'm suggesting a more extensive Edit (PR to come): |
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ Additionally: | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Up there (out of context) 309 & 311 are almost dups. also I'd pull "Please never use GitHub's green" down here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
But I digress, I'll do this myself.
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc.
@benjamingr FWIW (and it probably depends on what Google knows about you), when I Google "borked", the first thing I see is this definition:
I think that's probably more confusing in this context than helpful. |
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc. PR-URL: #12417 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Landed in 296f331 |
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc. PR-URL: #12417 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc. PR-URL: #12417 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc. PR-URL: #12417 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc. PR-URL: #12417 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc. PR-URL: #12417 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word "borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms. It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat `Optional:` to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc. PR-URL: nodejs/node#12417 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Sakthipriyan Vairamani <thechargingvolcano@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
I witnessed an English-as-a-second-language speaker puzzle over the word
"borked" in our documentation today. Reword to avoid colloquialisms.
It's more precise and clear this way anyway. Also reformat
Optional:
to be consistent with how it appears elsewhere in the doc.
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
doc